Aberration wrote:
Also not sure why you decided to bold that one sentence. The heat seeking missiles are obviously not being used to as great an impact considering we have not lost that many aircraft.
The number of aircraft is
shockingly low. Even if you to factor in a bit of fudging on the reasons, anti-aircraft fire is having little to no effect on coalition forces. Maybe a combination of good countermeasures and no one giving the Taliban free heat seeking missiles.
thunderstruck wrote:
Aberration wrote:
If the numbnuts from New York is not able to understand why we are in Afghanistan, then I am not going to explain it to him.
Whether we are being effective or not, whether it is a smart decision, is irrelevant to why we are there.
It's not just people from New York. A
majority of Americans support withdrawal.
Now, can you please explain why we are currently in Afghanistan or are you dodging the question because you are unsure yourself?

_________________
dengyong wrote:
I'm not your dad....you must have gotten the tiny pecker from someone else.