Interesting blog post I came across. It raises a good point.
It would come as no surprise if the Republicans won control of the House. The Senate is a different matter, but they are guaranteed to pick up a few seats--making the filibuster a rock solid barrier to any of Obama's proposals. In fact, with only a simple majority in the House needed to pass measures, Republicans may start making demands. The outcome seems pretty inevitable. Washington is currently much more polarized than it was in 1994-5, when Republicans forced a shutdown of the federal government.
So, if push comes to shove, should the Republicans do a repeat of '95 and shutdown the federal government?
Quote:
I’ve been too absorbed by my book projects and by Australian politics (of which more soon) to pay a lot of attention to the forthcoming US elections, but it seems to be widely projected that the Republicans could regain control of the House of Representatives. What surprises me is that no-one has drawn the obvious inference as to what will follow, namely a shutdown of the US government.
It seems obvious to me that a shutdown will happen – the Republicans of today are both more extreme and more disciplined than last time they were in a position to shut down the government, and they did it then. And they hate Obama at least as much now as they hated Clinton in 1995 (maybe not quite as much as they hated him by 2000, but they are getting there faster this time).
The big question is how a shutdown will be resolved. It seems to me that it will be a lot harder for Obama to induce the Republicans to back down than it was for Clinton. IIRC, no piece of legislation proposed by Obama has received more than a handful of votes in the House, and (unlike the case with Bob Dole in 1995) no aspiring Republican presidential candidate will have an interest in resolving the problem – the base would be furious. On the other hand, the price Obama would have to pay if he capitulated the Republicans would demand from Obama in a capitulation would be huge, certainly enough to end his presidency at one term. So, I anticipate a lengthy shutdown, and some desperate expedients to keep things running.
As far as I can tell, there is no mechanism for resolving this kind of deadlock – the House can’t be dissolved early as would happen in a parliamentary system. I think the Founders probably envisaged the House as having a “power of the purse” comparable to that of the British Commons. Whether they did or not, I’m sure this argument will be made, probably by people who have argued, until very recently, that the power of the Executive is essentially unlimited.
http://crookedtimber.org/2010/07/16/the-crisis-of-2011/
_________________
RIPTIDE wrote:
Srsly... STFU and stay on topic.
Aberration wrote:
The great depression is over played.
Aberration wrote:
Tax cuts do not cost anything.